THE SOURCE LOG Understanding AI HQ free worksheet, version 1.0 (2026-11-12) Fill it in online, print it or get the PDF: Understanding AI HQ website, Learn > Worksheets HOW TO USE IT 1. Write your question first, so you only collect what helps answer it. 2. Log each claim you'd use, with a source you've opened and read yourself. 3. If a source reports someone else's work, trace it to the original and log that too. ================================================================ 1. THE QUESTION ================================================================ WHAT I NEED TO KNOW, AND WHY > > WHAT WOULD CHANGE MY MIND > ================================================================ 2. CLAIMS AND SOURCES ================================================================ One row per claim. Confidence: High (original source, read in full), Medium (reliable secondary source), Low (couldn't trace). SOURCE LOG | Claim | Source (and original, if different) | Exact wording | Confidence ------- | ----- | ----------------------------------- | ------------- | ---------- Claim 1 | ____ | ____ | ____ | ____ Claim 2 | ____ | ____ | ____ | ____ Claim 3 | ____ | ____ | ____ | ____ Claim 4 | ____ | ____ | ____ | ____ ================================================================ 3. TRACE CHECK ================================================================ BEFORE I USE THESE CLAIMS [ ] I've opened every source myself, not just the AI's summary of it [ ] Every claim that came from a summary or news story is traced to its original [ ] The wording I'd use doesn't say more than the source does [ ] Claims I couldn't trace are marked Low or dropped MY ANSWER, IN TWO SENTENCES > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- AI can help you find and read sources. It can't be the source. Anything you'd put your name to should trace to something you've opened yourself. ################################################################ # EXAMPLE ANSWERS ################################################################ THE SOURCE LOG Understanding AI HQ free worksheet, version 1.0 (2026-11-12) Fill it in online, print it or get the PDF: Understanding AI HQ website, Learn > Worksheets HOW TO USE IT 1. Write your question first, so you only collect what helps answer it. 2. Log each claim you'd use, with a source you've opened and read yourself. 3. If a source reports someone else's work, trace it to the original and log that too. EXAMPLE ANSWERS. The example uses the real trace from the lesson, checked on 11 November 2026 against the Columbia Journalism Review report. ================================================================ 1. THE QUESTION ================================================================ WHAT I NEED TO KNOW, AND WHY > How often do AI search tools cite news sources correctly? For a slide on whether our team should trust AI citations. WHAT WOULD CHANGE MY MIND > A large, recent study showing high citation accuracy. ================================================================ 2. CLAIMS AND SOURCES ================================================================ One row per claim. Confidence: High (original source, read in full), Medium (reliable secondary source), Low (couldn't trace). SOURCE LOG | Claim | Source (and original, if different) | Exact wording | Confidence ------- | -------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------- | ---------- Claim 1 | AI search tools often misidentify news sources | CJR Tow Center, 6 Mar 2025 (original) | "incorrect answers to more than 60 percent of queries" | High Claim 2 | The test covered 8 tools | Same CJR report | "twenty publishers times ten articles times eight chatbots" | High Claim 3 | ____ | ____ | ____ | ____ Claim 4 | ____ | ____ | ____ | ____ ================================================================ 3. TRACE CHECK ================================================================ BEFORE I USE THESE CLAIMS [x] I've opened every source myself, not just the AI's summary of it [x] Every claim that came from a summary or news story is traced to its original [x] The wording I'd use doesn't say more than the source does [x] Claims I couldn't trace are marked Low or dropped MY ANSWER, IN TWO SENTENCES > In a 2025 test of eight AI search tools, the tools collectively misidentified the source of news excerpts in more than 60% of 1,600 queries. That's strong reason to check AI citations, though it measured news citation only. ---------------------------------------------------------------- AI can help you find and read sources. It can't be the source. Anything you'd put your name to should trace to something you've opened yourself.